|
Meanings: Box
Office Magazine Review
April 8, 1968 review by Box
Office Magazine.
The least that can be said for Stanley
Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" is that this production is an
overwhelming visual experience, supplemented by an imaginative use
of all the divergent elements which go into filmmaking. The most
that can be said for this MGM roadshow presentation in Cinerama,
filmed in Super Panavision and Metrocolor, is that once again, as
so rarely happens in film history, an individual talent -- Kubrick
-- has widened and exalted the art of the film by his vision, dedication
and uncompromising creative approach to the medium so often called
the "synthesis of all art forms."
"2001" is indeed beyond description
by conventional plot terms and descriptive tradepaper summaries.
As the past 10 or 12 years have shown, the old narratives which
dominated the film world have given way to themes, techniques and
concepts, once the private property of the avant-garde, the experimental
films, etc. Whether "Last Year at Marienbad" or "Trans-Europe-Express"
from France, or Roger Corman's "The Trip" or Kubrick's "2001," from
the U.S., the straightforward story has had it. And the audiences
of today, primarily the under-30 group down to the early teens,
have shown a great, almost revitalized, interest in movies as they
are now being made.
With Arthur C. Clarke's assistance,
plus the cooperation of NASA and leading American and British experts
in the field of space, science, research and the Academy, Kubrick
was able to create a real science-fiction film, one in which every
element will quite possibly be known to man in less than 30 years.
To audiences' surprise, the film starts
with the "dawn of man." Apes fight apes in a gloriously realistic
sequence lasting almost 20 minutes, when one ape discovers a weapon
to conquer his fellow apes. Done with actors, the sequence is frightening
and powerful. Not until into the body of the film will the audiences
come to understand the motive behind the monolithic slab, which
one of the apes touches.
With a beautifully edited slow-motion
sequence, a bone tossed into the air by an ape evolves into a spaceship
and audiences are at once caught in the world of "2001," as William
Sylvester talks to his daughter on earth on a television-type phone
from his way station under the moon. Strangely, none of the action
ever takes place on the earth itself. Sylvester is seeking the unknown
and asserting himself into the beyond, just as the apes did and
that monolithic slab appears again. Gary Lockwood and Keir Dullea
are the astronauts on the nine-month trip, living in a centrifuge
which continually rotates. They pit themselves against a talking
computer -- Hal 9000 -- who "really likes people." They lose contact
with Earth and Lockwood is killed by the neurotic Hal 9000. The
sequence in which Dullea goes inside the computer to destroy it
is one of the great scenes in the film stunningly photographed.
Dullea hits the Milky Way and the
last 20 minutes are as breathtaking as any 20 minutes ever filmed.
The conclusion is an odd, mystifying, cryptic summary, which restates
that tie with the opening scenes using the monolithic slab. Needless
to say, audiences should be as baffled by the last part of the film
as they are stimulated by the whole of this space epic. Kubrick
and Clarke obviously left the concept open to wide interpretation
so that audiences will be able to draw their own conclusions, in
the light of their own beliefs.
Throughout the film, the use of the
scientific data and equipment is reason enough to go to see it.
Add Kubrick's amazing and consummate skill as a director and editor
-- he designed the special photographic effects himself. His use
of performers is also fantastic, particularly Dullea's convincing
and moving transformation at the end. There may be some controversy
over the final moments which show an embryo in the skies assuming
the position of a star. Not the least creative is Kubrick's use
of music. Taking theme's as popular as Johann Strauss' "The Blue
Danube" waltz, and of other composers like Richard Strauss, Aram
Khatchaturian and Gyorgi Ligeti, he has defied convention at its
most obvious point, and with effective results.
For once, the advertising of a film
-- "the most technically complex movie ever made" and "you've never
seen anything like it" are factual. Kubrick has delivered a masterpiece,
but that is not to say the job is done, that Kubrick's film is so
unusual, so different, so fascinating that it is automatically pre-sold,
an easy sell which all audiences will pay to see. Anything but.
"2001" is special, one of the most special and perhaps difficult
roadshows of all time.
While costing between ten and $12
million, the film should be a big money-maker. Kubrick's work is
finished and the finished product is very salable. Audiences, through
the promotion and advertising, and surely word-of-mouth, will have
to be alerted to this exceptional work of art. The current class
exploitation and advertising will probably give way to the hard
sell -- using all the outlets available, most particularly television
and national publications, where some inkling of the strong visual
content can be exhibited.
"2001" is a challenge. Kubrick met
his challenge with unquestioned success. The rest of the challenge
is up to the distributor and exhibitors and the audience, too, to
prove that great filmmaking does pay off -- handsomely. Jim Watters
|